The Washington Post printed this chart of gun deaths in developed nations in December 2012:
USA Today has an interactive chart for those wishing to review the violence we’ve perpetrated on one another in 2013. Suffice it to say there are entirely too many entries in this database.
When will the numbers be too staggering? The incidents too horrific? The arguments of the rabid radicals too specious?
It’s taken 30+ years for the National Rifle Association to convince the public that the Second Amendment is to be interpreted by their lights only. The neo-Confederates, and related “militia” members are even willing to carry the NRA argument to its obvious extension — any person should be able to acquire any weapon necessary to take on the Evil Government — missile launchers anyone?
It’s taken 30+ years for the NRA and associated gun manufacturers to disseminate their message that the only answer to gun violence is more people armed with more guns willing to do more violence.
It’s taken 30+ years for people to think of school security not in terms of open and easy exits in case of fire, but in terms of sealed exits and magnetometers to prevent gun violence in our schools.
A cowardly Congress had the opportunity to take the least restrictive measures imaginable in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting. They passed. Republicans in the Senate filibustered the bill, the House of Representatives didn’t even address the issue.
A Washington, D.C. punditry — the Beltway Babblers — pontificated that the President must have failed because the opposition Party in the Cocktail Party Circuit Court of Opinion refused to cooperate. He should have “cooperated more?” The Senate bill which died as a result of the filibuster didn’t even contain the assault weapons ban, didn’t have a limit on ammunition capacity, didn’t prevent straw purchases, didn’t require comprehensive background checks… How much more were the Democrats supposed to compromise? Perhaps, “compromise” means giving the Republicans everything they want?
However, it’s easy to imagine that had the President not offered even the soft provisions of the Manchin Amendment, the Beltway Babblers would have noted the President had “caved” to pressure. Nowhere in the prolixity did anyone consider that it is a strange standard indeed to hold a President responsible for the behavior of the opposition party.
We don’t need a proliferation of guns. We have enough. We have a situation in which fewer people are buying more weapons. And, we have more than enough instances of babysitters leaving weapons unattended with tragic consequences, children playing with firearms with deadly effect, toddlers setting off firearms accidentally.
There are NO rights which do not come with responsibilities. A responsible gun owner locks and stores guns properly. A responsible gun owner doesn’t encourage gun violence. A responsible gun owner supports closing the gun show loophole, and shutting down the straw purchases of guns which all too often fall conveniently into the hands of gangs and criminals.
I am frankly very tired of the antiquated arguments of gun enthusiasts. I am even more exhausted by their circumlocution and specious contentions. However, one has to admire their focus. They are single issue voters of the first water. Their enthusiasm is boundless. And…they are rapidly turning me into a single issue voter as well, just on the other side of their issue.
I am not willing to accept a vision of America as a violent nation, a country willing to sacrifice its children on the altar of Gun Rights. One youngster in a Denver hospital, in a coma, is one too many.
Enough is Enough.