The Background: There are 1,418,000 Nevada residents in the state’s civilian labor force, and 7% of them are looking for work. The state has 1,254,300 individuals in the non-farm wage and salary category, up 3.4% since last year. 28.11% are employed in a single sector – Leisure and Hospitality. 5.41% are employed in construction related jobs.
|Category||% of employment||change YOY|
|Trade, Trans, Utility||18.97%||+3.8%|
|Prof Bus. Services||12.68%||+2.8%|
|Mining & Logging||1.08%||-5.6%|
(Source: Department of Labor, BLS)
The first table shows the situation at the present. Projections from NDETR estimate what employment will look like as of 2022.
|Category||Number of openings from Growth to 2022|
|Office & Admin Support||16,990|
|Sales Related Occupations||12,120|
|Personal Care & Service||11,700|
|Healthcare Practitioners & Assts.||7,780 (+3,680 Support positions)|
|Business Financial Occupations||6,850|
*There are projected to be another 6,500 jobs in the Installation, Maintenance, and Repair occupations category; and, about 4,840 jobs related to Education, Training, and Library personnel positions. Of the 24,580 jobs in “Construction and Extraction” only 80 openings are projected to be in the “extraction” category related to “growth.” In short, the Nevada economy of 2022 is projected to be much like the Nevada economy of 2015.
False and Forced Choices
Now that we have some hard data, and some rationally projected data about employment opportunities in Nevada extending to 2022, it’s time to take a gander at some of the policy decisions which need to be made about how to create expansion in the economy.
Here’s a classic example of how NOT to approach the issue:
“The left claims they’re for American workers, and they’ve got lame ideas, things like minimum wage. We need to talk about how we get people skills and qualifications they need to get jobs that go beyond minimum wage.”
First, the most recent entry into the GOP Candidate Bus separates “skills and qualifications” from issues about raising the minimum wage. This seems to be an artificial forced choice – either one supports the minimum wage increases or one supports more education and training to become qualified for better paying jobs. (Not that Governor Walker’s slashing of the higher education budget makes his position comprehensible?) It is humanly possible to support both increasing the minimum wage AND support additional resources for our post secondary educational institutions. And, there are some practical reasons this would make sense for Nevada.
Secondly, let’s look at the minimum wage issue as a practical matter in Nevada. Retail sales worker positions account for 7,450 of the 12,120 projected job openings due to growth in the NDETR estimations for 2022. Food and beverage service positions account for 13,260 of the total 23,100 food preparation and serving jobs estimated to be available by 2022. What would punch up the economy of Nevada faster? Leaving the minimum wage at current levels for the expected positions in retail and hospitality sectors of the Nevada economy? Or, increasing the minimum wage for those 20,710 jobs?
A person earning $7.25 per hour working 40 hours per week for 50 weeks per year would earn $14,500. A person earning $10.00 per hour working a 40 hour work week for 50 weeks would earn $20,000 annually. If you are keeping score with your calculator – that’s a difference of some $113,905,000 available to be pumped into the local economy from those 20,710 jobs. Since we know from the research that lower income workers spend more on basic household expenses, that’s an additional $114 million for groceries and supermarkets, clothing stores, housing and furnishings, and for transportation. One more time – The GDP formula:
Now, about those “qualifications and skills..”
Where does one get additional training for higher paying jobs? If a person did not intend to stay in a minimally paying food service job, or a low paying construction job, or a low pay office job, then where are the training programs for advancement?
Let’s assume for the first argument that an individual wants to advance in the same field as his or her entry level position. Nevada has both public and proprietary post secondary educational programs available. [NVps pdf] On the public side, a person wanting to move up in the office might want to consider an associate’s degree in bookkeeping? Management? The community colleges offer these programs throughout the state. And, yes, a person earning more than a minimum wage might be better able to take advantage of the post secondary training available from the Nevada system.
How about a move from one occupation category to another? What if our hypothetical prospective employee wants to move from a retail job into the field of medical or health information technology? There’s a program for that at Southern Nevada College.
In short, the most efficient and cost effective way to provide career pathways for economic improvement is to invest in our community colleges and technical education institutions. These are also the best ways to assist older workers who are moving from declining fields to those in which some growth is expected.
What did the President have to say about community colleges?
“As the largest part of the nation’s higher education system, community colleges enroll more than 6 million students and are growing rapidly. They feature affordable tuition, open admission policies, flexible course schedules, and convenient locations. Community Colleges are particularly important for students who are older, working, or need remedial classes. Community colleges work with businesses, industry and government to create tailored training programs to meet economic needs like nursing, health information technology, advanced manufacturing, and green jobs.”
So, yes, it makes sense to provide support for post secondary education in Nevada. Those “qualifications and skills” have to come from somewhere, and what better way than to expand the capacity of our post secondary programs to enroll and instruct those who want to advance in a chosen field or become qualified for employment in a new one.
Meanwhile, we have to acknowledge that a preponderance of the growth in this state is still in occupational categories such as retail sales and food service which are relatively low paying jobs, and from which we could expect much more robust economic growth by requiring if not a living wage of $15.00 per hour then at least an increase to $10.00.
No forced or artificial false choices are required: We really can do two things at once.