In his own, inimitable, fashion Congressman Mark Amodei (R-NV2) has encapsulated the wavering stance of those who don’t want to take any real action on climate change, but who’d like very much not to appear too much like the Inquisitors of Galileo.
“Amodei described himself as new to climate change issues and stopped short of endorsing the scientific consensus that rising global temperatures are driven by humans burning fossil fuels for energy.
But he said he will continue to gather research on the issue and added that facts should drive policy.
“It bugs me just as much when somebody starts out it is all BS as when somebody starts out the world is going to end tomorrow,” Amodei said. “If you are really going to be fact based then you need people who are going to argue both ways. You just don’t want a bunch of ‘yes’ people.” [RGJ]
First, Amodei noted that he didn’t think the request from the Trumpster transition team for a list of those Department of Energy employees who had worked on climate science projects was appropriate. That’s good, because witch-hunts and purges have been notoriously counter productive. Then come the excuses… “I’m new to the topic.”
This is analogous to “give me some time and I’ll get back to you.”
And, yes – facts should drive policy. That would be scientific facts, not political ones. Further, using the straw man technique doesn’t further even the political argument. No one is saying “the world is going to end tomorrow.” What scientists ARE saying is that there is concrete evidence that the increasing climate change is happening because of human activity. These aren’t “yes men.”
In fact, “The greater the climate expertise among those surveyed, the higher the consensus on human-caused global warming.” [SSci]
What opponents of new energy sources and systems have been touting over the past few years is the MYTH of a lack of consensus:
“That’s why those who oppose taking action to curb climate change have engaged in a misinformation campaign to deny the existence of the expert consensus. They’ve been largely successful, as the public badly underestimate the expert consensus, in what we call the “consensus gap.” Only 16% of Americans realize that the consensus is above 90%.” [SSci] (emphasis added)
Representative Amodei has firmly inserted himself into that mythological gap.
On one side of his self constructed fence, he did co-sponsor the American Renewable Energy Production Tax Credit Extension, a bill which went to the House Ways and Means Committee, and then into oblivion. On the other side, he co-sponsored the “Stop Green Initiative Abuse Act,” which amended the Energy Conservation and Production Act to repeal provisions of the Department of Energy’s weatherization assistance program for low income persons to increase the energy efficiency of dwellings. [OTI]
A some point it might behoove the Representative to note that not every one else is straddling a semantic fence and continue his education on the issue:
Here’s the Department of Defense on the implications of climate change on national security.
“The report finds that climate change is a security risk, Pentagon officials said, because it degrades living conditions, human security and the ability of governments to meet the basic needs of their populations. Communities and states that already are fragile and have limited resources are significantly more vulnerable to disruption and far less likely to respond effectively and be resilient to new challenges, they added.” [DoD]
In addition to national defense, there’s also the not-so-small matter of emergency planning and responses. Emergency Managers have some thoughts on this:
“Since storms are becoming more severe, disaster response costs have risen. The costs of major hurricanes has increased sharply over the last decade, and the spending totals for cleaning up after major floods across the Midwest and South have spiked. More victims and more damages mean more money. If supplies are not available, they must be flown in. Victims may go without necessities and become ill, which results in increased medical costs or an increased demand for medical supplies. Disaster plans must account for the increasing severity of storms and how they create the need for more response supplies.” [EMD.org]
This scenario isn’t too difficult to follow. Climate change leads to severe storms, severe storms cause more damage, more damage means more costs, more expenses mean more money. The bottom line is that any emergency management plan which does NOT incorporate the effects of climate change isn’t really a plan at all – just a prayer and a wish list.
As much as Representative Amodei may want to dawdle, fence straddle, and muse about “collecting more facts,” the facts themselves are clear – climate change is happening – climate change is caused by human activity – and to ignore these facts is to make this country (and many others) more vulnerable.
It has now been 2059 days since the president-elect promised to release his tax returns (April 27, 2011) In light of the ‘Russian Connection’ to the 2016 campaign it seems essential for the American public to find out what financial ties the prospective president has to the Russian government and economy.