So, the President of the United States delivered a lecture to the members of NATO today about “paying up,” and focusing on global terrorism. Fine and dandy…members who can pay, should pay and there is a need to address incidents of global terrorism. That said, one of NATO’s prime reasons for existence is as a North Atlantic counterweight to RUSSIAN incursions into Europe. And we have a President who seems preternaturally incapable of making strong comments about the Putin Regime. Since everyone else is piling into the discussion, DB will add some questions to the combination Mare’s and Hornet’s nests.
How did characters like Flynn, Manafort, Page, Sessions et. alia. get involved in the efforts to effect the election of Donald J. Trump? We all know they had contacts with Russians. Some contacts were reported, others were not. Mere contact with Russians doesn’t necessarily prove nefarious purposes, but the context and timing of some contacts is certainly open to question. Investigations and inquiries will add to the chronology and context, but that doesn’t serve to shed light on WHY this cast of characters was drawn to the Trump Campaign.
Are there among us those who would do the Kremlin’s bidding? For purposes of their own, or at the behest of the administration?
What is it that the Kremlin wants? The Center for Strategic and International Studies issued its Kremlin Playbook in October 2016, with the announcement that in Hungary, Latvia, Slovakia, Serbia, and Bulgaria:
“This research determined that Russia has cultivated an opaque web of economic and political patronage across the region that the Kremlin uses to influence and direct decisionmaking. This web resembles a network-flow model—or “unvirtuous circle”—which the Kremlin can use to influence (if not control) critical state institutions, bodies, and economies, as well as shape national policies and decisions that serve its interests while actively discrediting the Western liberal democratic system.”
How the Russians proposed to do this is summarized in Senator Sheldon Whitehouse’s prepared remarks for the May 8, 2017 session on Russian Interference in politics. (note: PDF)
What elements might create the confluence between Russian interests and American politicians and political campaigns? There are as many possibilities as there are individuals involved, perhaps ranging from personal animosities to broader financial entanglements. Nor should we dismiss the possibility of a combination of motives.
One avenue of inquiry might be the financial relationship between the Trump business operations and Russian funding. Trump’s “comeback” from financial disaster in the 1990’s has been cited as evidence of a shift from American banks to a reliance on Deutsche Bank. Evidence unearthed thus far doesn’t substantiate claims of Russian financial entanglement, however there is much to be said for the Deep Throat (Mark Felt) advice during the Watergate investigations — follow the money.
We know from the CSIS study that “Using shell corporations and other devices, Russia establishes illicit financial relationships to develop leverage against prominent figures, through the carrot of continued bribery or the stick of threatened disclosure.”
What might we learn as investigations of the connections between Trump businesses and shell corporations continue? Would this explain the attraction of the ‘cast of characters’ to the Trump campaign and administration? Would this help explain the use of other Russian tactics — propaganda, fake news, bots, and Internet Trolls? Hacking and theft of political information? Timed leaks of damaging materials?
There are two courts in play in these controversies — the judiciary and the court of public opinion. While it may be difficult to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that a proximate cause of Trump’s pro-Putin stance is financial entanglement in a court of law, it’s far more likely that the political court of public opinion will find Trump’s proclivity toward pandering to the Russian Bear ever more unpalatable. Stay tuned, it’s going to be a long and sometimes tedious ride.