If a person hasn’t found the reason to call Senator Heller’s office and advise him to vote NO on the Republican version of a health care bill, consider the following:
(1) One in three residents of skilled nursing facilities in Nevada are supported by Medicaid. Now, apply a simple calculator test — if a person was born in 1946 (the beginning of the Baby Boom) he or she will hit 80 in 2026. In short, the Baby Boomers will be in the age range to need such care just as the major cuts to Medicaid kicks in. About 65,000,000 children were born in this country between 1945 and 1961. Cuts to the Medicaid program in this context is essentially create a crisis which we could easily have avoided.
(2) The Republicans are fond of focusing on “premium increases.” That’s only a part of the story. Anyone can devise insurance policies with low premiums — raise the deductibles, cut the coverage, increase co-pays, insert lifetime benefit limits, and Voila! lower premiums. The problems begin when a person tries to use the insurance — the reason the person bought the policy in the first place — “We’re so sorry, but this policy doesn’t cover immunizations. Or, mammograms, or prostate cancer screening, or the expenses related to the birth of your first child…”
(3) Speaking of lower premiums, if a person has insurance from an employer then there should be no surprise when the coverage decreases compliments of the waivers included in the Senate bill — “We’re sorry, but we no longer cover wellness screenings for men and women, maternity care, or other elements that used to be included as Essential Benefits.” If a person thought that employer sponsored policies were “safe” from “reforms,” please think again.
(4) This isn’t a health care bill, it’s a tax cut bill. Those whose income is in the top 0.1% level would receive a lovely $250,000 tax savings gift in 2026. Those earning more than $875,000 (top 1%) would get tax savings of $45,500. [CNN] All this at the expense of working Americans.
(5) The buzz word “patient centered” is nonsense. At bottom, it’s a euphemistic way of saying “You are On Your Own.” A person can “choose” to buy what he or she can afford — and for lower income Americans this means lower coverage and higher out of pocket expenses. The problem with applying classic market principles to health care is that much of what is covered isn’t a matter of Choice. No one chooses to be in a traffic accident, any more than a person chooses to get cancer or have a heart attack. The Republican argument seems to boil down to “live a perfect life and make excellent choices” and you are ‘worthy’ of having insurance. This argument only works IF a person has no familial risk factors, IF a person isn’t exposed to other people (who might have an infectious disease), and IF a person can afford to build a residence in which there are no places to fall and no way to have an accident with a garage door. In short, it’s fantasy land.
The next few hours are crucial — that’s right — HOURS. Please call Senator Heller’s office at 702-388-6605; or 775-686-5770; or 202-224-6244. Your health care services are at stake.