No, I don’t feel one tiny little bit of need to be one tiny little bit magnanimous or even a tiny little bit of need to be tolerant of the Oaf in the Oval Office — or the politicians who enable him.
I feel no need to be tolerant of those who rally the uglies. The uglies are those who think calling out African American congressional representatives (see: Frederica Wilson and Maxine Waters) and addressing them with epithets is appropriate from an Oval Office occupant. And, what’s with calling out Jemele Hill of ESPN? What do these three have in common? Oh, yeah, I get it. It’s obvious. The Oaf’s performance in Pennsylvania was enough to curdle any and all positive feelings toward a once proud office and a once proud political party. It’s OK to be outraged, in fact if a person isn’t outraged then it’s time for a reality check.
I feel no need to be tolerant of a government which cannot seem to find voice when our closest ally on this planet is told that a nerve agent attack in Salisbury “looks” like the Russians did it, but “we” will wait for a conversation with Prime Minister May before making a statement. WE have already heard from the Prime Minister. She was all over the TV landscape yesterday with strong words in their Parliament. She was concise. She was forceful. She was measured but emphatic. WE can take her word for it. She doesn’t need to reveal sources and methods in order for US to believe her. In fact, I used up my blogging time yesterday watching BBC News, and following their news and analysis. There wasn’t anything nebulous about the coverage. However, WE have an Oval Office Occupant who can’t bring himself to say anything negative about one of the most egregious thugs on this planet. Why it is even necessary to ask: Now, will we implement the sanctions against Russian passed almost unanimously by Congress last year?
I feel no need to take his sycophants like Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Moscow Oblast) seriously. Rep. Nunes is perfectly free to make a complete fool of himself with his issuance of a report clearly intended to exonerate the Oval Office Oaf. Except it won’t. Representative Nunes evidently believes it is more important to protect the OOO than to determine to what extent the current mis-administration was aligned with Russian efforts to interfere in our electoral processes and institutions. Rep. Nunes is marching alongside those who find it impossible to conduct serious inquiries and thereby suggest serious legislation to resolve problems which led to the Russian interference.
I feel no need to support an administration the prime characteristic of which is the cacophony of a one man band playing off key and out of rhythm. The Oval Office Oaf doesn’t even have the courage to fire people face to face. He sends a body-guard to fire the former Director of the FBI, he sends a tweet to fire a Secretary of State, he is a coward. He may want “conflict” but he can’t handle confrontation.
Item: He conducted a skit about DACA at the White House. He was all for a compromise, he would take the political heat, he would sign a bi-partisan bill. Until — he got a bi-partisan bill delivered to him for his approval and suddenly he didn’t want to take the political heat, and he caved to the racist opponents of immigration reform.
Item: He conducted a skit concerning gun reform at the White House. He was all for several proposals which might reduce the lethality of mass shootings. Until — he met with the leadership of the NRA, and suddenly he was carrying their water in oversize pails. There’s precious little reason for anyone to visit the White House to present proposals on most important subjects because the Oval Office Oaf will make comments and express concern only to reverse himself faster than a used car lot inflatable air dancer in a hurricane.
I feel no need to be tolerant of an administration beset with moral and ethical issues. Granted there have been embarrassments in all administrations. However, this one is beyond the range of our previous imagination. One year into an administration and key members can’t get a security clearance? At least one person who was under investigation for “serious financial crimes,” was fired from the White House only to find immediate employment with the re-election campaign this week. Who hires people who are under investigation for “serious financial crimes?” Four Cabinet officials have been ‘reprimanded’ for their questionable travel and expenditures. Four, and it’s only 400+ days into an administration.
Presidents need not be saints, and Heaven knows a few of ours haven’t been, but pay offs to a porn star? That’s a new one. Yes, supporters of James Blaine in the 1884 election would chant “Ma Ma Where’s My Pa?” The rejoinder from advocates of Grover Cleveland’s candidacy was “Gone to the White House, Ha Ha Ha.” However, none of our former Presidents faced allegations of sexual misconduct from 19 women.
And then there’s the money.
“…an investigation by The New York Times into the financial maze of Mr. Trump’s real estate holdings in the United States reveals that companies he owns have at least $650 million in debt — twice the amount than can be gleaned from public filings he has made as part of his bid for the White House. The Times’s inquiry also found that Mr. Trump’s fortunes depend deeply on a wide array of financial backers, including one he has cited in attacks during his campaign.” [NYT]
His claim that he’s had “nothing to do with Russia” is pure nonsense. For all the salacious interest in the Oval Office Oaf’s sexual misconduct — the more fruitful segments of current investigations are likely encapsulated in the Nixon era maxim “follow the money.”
In the mean time, I do not intend to “follow the President,” and I do not wish him well as he undercuts environmental protections, consumer protections, financial consumer protections; our standing among nations, our relationships with our allies, and our prestige in the world. Nor do I intend to grant him any accolades for continuing his divisive, irrational, and racist rhetoric. One campaign filled with that was sufficient.
I do take some comfort knowing that 65,853,516 people in this country may agree with me.